During oral arguments today at the Supreme Court, Justice Antonin Scalia and attorney Ted Olson had a pointed exchange over whether same-sex marriage is a fundamental right guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution.?
Scalia's argument, which was advanced by Chief Justice John Roberts before him, was that when the institution of marriage developed historically, it was not done with the explicit intent of excluding gay and lesbian couples.
"We don't prescribe law for the future," Scalia said. "We decide what the law is. I'm curious,?when did it become unconstitutional to?exclude homosexual couples from marriage? 1791? 1868? When the Fourteenth Amendment was adopted?"
Olson countered that with a question of his own, bringing up two past high-profile cases involving discrimination.?
"When?did?it?become?unconstitutional to prohibit interracial marriages??When?did it?become unconstitutional to?assign?children to separate schools?" Olson asked.
The two went back and forth, with Scalia repeatedly questioning when, specifically, it became unconstitutional to bar gay couples from marrying. Olson argued back, but ended up conceding that there was no specific date.
"Well,?how?am?I?supposed?to how?to?decide?a?case,?then,?if you can't give me a?date when the Constitution changes?" Scalia said.
"Because in the case that's before?you today, the citizens of?California decide ? after the California Supreme Court?decided that individuals had a right to get married?irrespective of their sexual orientation in California ??then the Californians decided in Proposition 8, wait a?minute, we don't want those people to be able to get?married."
Source: http://www.businessinsider.com/scalia-gay-marriage-prop-8-case-supreme-court-2013-3
Meteor Hits Russia Dorner Manifesto Valentines Day Quotes nerlens noel Mark Balelo Anne Stringfield paczki
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.